COVID-19 Police States - An Interview with Ex-Police Officer Vincent Gircys
What happens when orders violate constitutional and human rights as well as police oaths?
Around the world, duty police officers are sworn to uphold government laws through enforcement and withholding of personal opinions. But what happens when orders violate constitutional and human rights as well as police oaths?
Join us for an exclusive interview with Vincent Gircys, a former Ontario Provincial Police Officer, who freely shares his thoughts on Covid-19 emergency measures and the dangerous state of policing around the world.
Great interview with former OPP and his thoughts on policing during the pandemic. We also need an interview with the police who actually engaged in the enforcing of the police state rules. It would be interesting to see what motivated them to go against human rights.
An ER doc in Ontario had 6 hangings in his emergency room in January. During the winter months we have seasonal mood disorder and when you complicated that with lockdowns and closures of outdoor activities such as hockey skiing and other winter activities and saw police brutality and harassment against those who dared engage in those activities in certain areas one can understand how there could be suicides. Very sad.
I watch both sides of the debate on lock downs. I watch who they all follow. I also look to see what triggers their response and that gives a clue as to who they support or might be funded by and who might hit a nerve as to connections.
The HCQ crowd has not changed to Ivermectin. Like anything there is many treatments. Some treatments work better for one person. The questions arise as to why it was banned? Why Ivermectin banned. Shoe fits all ventilator use seems rather weird as very invasive and had a 80 to 90% failure and death rate and kept patients in ICU longer. However old safe drugs were not. Early treatments ignored. Test positive go home and take care of yourself. Heavy people who tested positive were essentially left alone and my guess many hyper ventilated while doing so. Anxiety lack of exercise pre existing conditions whether ever diagnosed or not were at play. People who. had covid 19 describe the mental toll of the measures taken. Mental health affects physical health.
I am very interested in reading those for and against vaccines. We have Dr. Byram Bridle and a team of researchers speaking on research of the spike protein and I watch those who try to attack his reputation. The blood clots neurological events strokes heart attacks skin disorders eye problems including blindness irregular bleeding all indicate something dangerous happening. You can't state the heart inflammation is mild and clears up quickly but your forgetting they have no clue about long term effects so those whose heart inflammation went away can be subject to the next problems scientists and doctors have predicted in the next influenza season or after the second dose. You might say look we have given out 1 billion shots and we have only 2 million adverse events and 20000 deaths but again you don't know what will happen on the second dose or next influenza season because you don't have data and it's a live experiment happening.. The fact it is causing that many serious effects and deaths and it's only a very small percentage of the true reactions being reported then you do not have proof it is safe for everyone. You cannot ignore the bad stuff happening to the young and healthy. You be a cool to ignore that fact and everyone has a right to decide if they want to take the risk or not. They don't ban cigarettes even though second hand smoke kills so then how come such a push for a vaccine that is experimental and as more vaccinated more problems are happening but many want to cover those problems up and they would love to ban the non vaccinated from daily life activities. Seems odd. Vape shops have opened up a dime a dozen during covid yet it's a respiratory virus and pre covid there was an epidemic of vaping deaths and hospital admissions.
The threat of a false flag and removal of a podcast about the vaccine on children seems to have caught the attention of those pro vaccine and pro lockdowns. That's interesting.. Why? The anonymous government official calling and threatening the podcast stated many in the US government would not take the vaccine. Why is that? Then why should anyone who doesn't want the vaccine have to take it to get their lives back. Very simple question to answer. The normal response is that the podcaster is attacked by pro vaccine people. Yes everyone can get a little passionate and might need to re tweak their stuff but threats to remove one that speaks about harms to children is a sign that it hit a nerve and threats are always cover ups.
It's great to see pro vaccine people ignore the harms and sad stories of serious reactions and deaths. Toronto Star had a front page of their paper with a sad story of a covid survivor but nothing on those hurt by the vaccine. Why not?
That's called unbiased reporting. Both sides of the story
Take it with a grain of salt because those with outrageous models stoking fear all day long have added to the suicides despair and untold misery and trying to say we saved 50000 by lockdowns instead of 25000 who died are incorrect as the number died includes those never tested but presumed or those in hospice who tested positive but had no symptoms and many who tested positive but had no symptoms those who committed suicide but tested positive and no autopsies done to confirm any of it and the PCR test has many false positives and we included antibodies tests in the cases and did they do antibodies test on the dead to call it a covid death.
They will have to answer those questions as to the handling of the pandemic including constant scare tactics fear mongering of lack of ICU space when the data shows otherwise so how many deaths from missed surgeries missed screenings and fear to go to the hospitals. Will that surpass the 25000 that died from with a covid 19 positive test? Or how many died by being put on ventilators too soon as data from across the world indicates that. Yes none of this is to minimize those who died from covid 19. Very sad of their struggles and deaths but fear mongering to the healthy is unacceptable as well and that fear mongering impacted health to a very high degree. Asymptomatic spread has been debunked and that's where the scare tactics originated from. Then came masks which has been shown to not work and can increase health issues. These pro lockdown and pro vaccine ignore the harms and refuse to accept responsibility for their antics. This is a tell all sign of the problem.
They will even ignore the pictures of the G7 leaders with no masks no social distancing lots of people from different countries enjoying the beautiful Cornwall scenery in beautiful gardens eating and drinking and enjoying themselves while they mandate small numbers wear the masks still don't travel and scare the population with emerging variants. What a farce.
Your doing a great job Bright Lights. If only the MSM would do their jobs properly and report unbiased. You can tell which newspapers or media support which political party. Plain rubbish. We definitely are in a police state. When they arrest pastors in Alberta but at the same time the Premier is observed breaking his own rules it appears the government is abusing the police forces and using them for his agenda not to protect the people as it should be. Why not jail for the Premier? a ticket? Only an apology. But jail to a few pastors and a restaurant owner. Curious agenda behind all of this. Would appear as if it's scripted. Not about health. Everyone knew Trudeau would remove the quarantine for fully vaccinated before coming home from G7 in Britain that's why he is supposedly double dosed. You can read them like a book.